9 articles
Measured results, methods and evaluation notes from our own testing.
In our test on 16 October 2026, adding a page of key phrases from the job ad to 8 resumes that did not fit the job moved their scores by 0.25 points on average, between -2.5 and +1.5 points on a 0…
When HireSalt reads a job description, it drafts a short list of job-specific criteria to score resumes against. We tested whether those criteria describe the job’s real work. Across 30 job…
In both counts we have made, yes. In 237 test screenings from our 7 October 2026 benchmark run, all 9,314 criterion scores came with a written reason. A second count on 16 October 2026, on the model…
In October 2026, most of them on 16 October, we ran a set of tests on HireSalt’s scoring using sample resumes and job descriptions and no customer data. New runs used our production model. Two…
In three timed runs on 16 October 2026, HireSalt scored every resume in piles of 25, 50 and 100, with no failures. The rates were 271, 252 and 392 resumes per hour. The rate varied from run to run…
In our test, 5 of 5 resume files HireSalt could not read cost 0 credits once processing finished. That is a small test: 5 files, one run, on 16 October 2026. It shows what happened to these five…
A prior run’s calibration numbers were meaningless because heuristic-labeled pairs and pairs carrying the dataset’s own labels were mixed. The repository’s notes report a 2.6-point separation on the…
Our latest repeatability check, on 16 October 2026, missed the bar we set for it: 21 of 32 resume and job pairs stayed within 5 points across three runs, against a rule of 80%. We do not claim…
Three models scored each of 143 resume-job pairs. On 14 pairs—about one in ten—the same pair received scores at least 20 points apart. Across the seven models tested against the baseline, pooled…